首頁 > 影音網>務實面對二戰歷史 Be honest to WWII history
務實面對二戰歷史 Be honest to WWII history

[原著]

[謝鎮寬]於2015-08-31 19:08:08上傳[]

 

務實面對二戰歷史

 

1945年8月6日美國,在日本廣島引爆第一顆原子彈,第二顆於8月9日在長崎,8月15日裕仁天皇透過電台播放預錄玉音,向盟軍宣告日本無條件投降,日本外交部長重光葵於1945年9月2日,在美國密蘇里號軍艦上簽署降書,由理察·薩瑟蘭見證,二戰太平洋戰區斯時遂告停火落幕。

 

就在同一天,麥克阿瑟將軍對日本皇軍,頒布了他的第一道軍令狀,要他們向各地所屬盟軍指揮官投降。第一條A款「在中國 (滿洲除外)台灣及北緯16度以北法屬越南境內的日本高級將領應向蔣介石元帥。」從那時起,台灣由蔣介石執行軍事佔領,即使二次大戰已正式結束,但台灣仍被中華民國流亡政權,漫無止境的軍事統治。

 

中華民國於1949年被中華人民共和國打垮、踢出中國,亡命台灣。日本於1951年9月8日,放棄對台灣和澎湖列島所有權利、權益和主張,於1952年4月28日生效,沒有指名誰是台灣主權的授予者,但依據舊金山和平條約,明確指定美國軍事政府為主要佔領權國。

 

馬英九於8月23日投書華盛頓時報,宣稱「1941年當太平洋戰爭爆發,中華民國即對日本宣戰,並廢除馬關條約」,及根據開羅宣言、波茨坦宣言和日本降書,日本與美國兩者都依法應受到約束牽制。

 

真是有夠胡扯,一位哈佛大學法學博士畢業生,居然不知開羅宣言,只是盟軍討論未來,如何結束戰爭之策略意向書,根本就不是法律條約、不具約束力,還有,它只是一紙在開羅電台廣播的新聞公報。波茨坦宣言之所以被日本降書引述,主要是其第8條,規範日本未來領土為:「開羅宣言之條件必須執行,日本領土將局限於,本州、北海道、九州、四國島,及由我們所決定的小島嶼」,根本沒有涉及台灣和澎湖列島。事實上,蔣介石根本就沒出席,這次為規範日本投降條款的重要會議。

 

馬投書更離譜的是,宣稱「1971年6月在簽署歸還沖繩協議之前,美國知會中華民國,只有把釣魚台列島管轄權移交給日本-不是主權 - 該協議書不影響中華民國的主權要求」。

 

白痴的馬統根本就不解,去研讀舊金山和平條約,第10條指明「日本放棄,一切有關中國之特別權利與利益,包括源自 1901 年九月七日簽署於北京之辛丑條約條款」,完全不溯及1895年的馬關條約。第三條,日本將同意美國對北緯 29 度以南之西南群島等地(包括琉球群島及大東群島),送交聯合國託管處置的任何建議,而美國是唯一管理當局。美國在琉球群島實施行政管理,直至1971 年6月11日,美日簽訂《歸還沖繩協定》,次年將琉球群島的行政管理權歸還日本,其中包括釣魚台列嶼。這意味著尖閣列島的主權始終由日本擁有,而不是中華民國。

 

講白一點,中華民國在今天世上,甚至沒有任何屬於自己的領土主權,不擁有台灣、不擁有中國。它只不過是,在美國軍事政府「有效總控制」保護傘下,一個「有效控制」台灣的流亡政府,中華民國那有資格,宣稱擁有尖閣島的主權呢?

 

沒錯,2015年標誌著第二次世界大戰終戰70週年,中華民國及中華人民共和國,先後在台灣及中國,軍演、閱兵、吹噓自己的豐功偉業,說戰爭是因為他們抗日才結束,而不是美軍的功勞。他們也扭曲了二戰的真實歷史,軍事佔領在台灣還沒正式結束。請務實地面對二戰歷史,是的,現在該是正式宣佈,結束在台灣軍事佔領的時候了,現在該是時候中華民國回歸中國,放手台灣,讓台灣自己當家作主吧。

 

謝鎮寬

加州、海沃


Be honest to WWII history

 

August 6, 1945 the US detonated an atomicbomb over Hiroshima Japan and second one on August 9 at Nagasaki. Emperor Hirohito announced through a recorded address over radio the unconditional surrender of Japan to the Allies on August 15. Japanese Foreign Affairs Minister Mamoru Shigmitsu signed the Japanese Instrument of Surrender on board of USS Missouriwitnessed by General Richard Sutherland on September 2, 1945 and the Pacific Theater of WWII accordingly ceased fire and came to the end.

 

On the same day, General Douglas MacArthurgave his first general order to the forces of the Empire of Japan to surrender to designated Allied commanders. Article 1a “The senior Japanese commanders andall ground, sea, air and auxiliary forces within China (excluding Manchuria), Formosa and French Indo-China north of 16 north latitude shall surrender to Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek.” since then Taiwan was military occupied by CKS even though the WWII had been officially ended but Taiwan is still under the endless term of military occupation by the exiled government of Republic of China.

 

ROC was defeated by PRC, kicked out of China andescaped to Taiwan in 1949. Japan renounced all right, title and claim to Formosa and the Pescadores on September 8, 1951 and effective on April 28, 1952. There was not any recipient named as the sovereign of Taiwan but clearly specified that USMG as the principal occupying power under the San Francisco Peace Treaty.

 

Ma Ying-jeou wrote a letter to Washington Times on August 23 claiming “When the Pacific War broke out in 1941 the Republic of China declared war against Japan and abrogated the Treaty of Shimonoseki.” And under the Cairo Declaration, the Potsdam Proclamation and the Japanese Instrument of Surrender that both Japan and the US are legally bond.

 

What a shame of a graduate JD of the Harvard University not even aware of the Cairo Declaration was only an intent of the Allies for future strategy to end the war which was not a legal treaty withbinding power. BTW, it was only a news communique for radio broadcasting in Cairo. The reason Potsdam Proclamation quoted in the Japanese Instrument of Surrender was for the limitation of Japan’s territory in article 8: “The terms of the Cairo Declaration shall be carried out and Japanese sovereignty shall be limited to the islands of Honshu, Hokkaido, Kyushu, Shikoku and such minorislands as we determine.” There was not anything related to Formosa and thePescadores and as a matter of fact, CKS did not attend this important meeting to regulate the terms for Japanese Surrender.

 

Ma’s letter went even more outrageously claiming “Priorto the signing of the Okinawa Reversion Agreement in June 1971 between the United States and Japan, the U.S. notified the ROC that only administrative rights over the Diaoyutai Islands were being transferred to Japan — not sovereignty — and that the agreement had no effect on the ROC’s sovereignty claim.”

 

The bumbler president Ma simply doesn’t read the San Francisco Peace Treaty at all that article 10 “Japan renounces allspecial rights and interests in China, including all benefits and privilegesresulting from the provisions of the final Protocol signed at Peking 辛丑條約on 7 September 1901”not touch the Shimonoseki Treaty in 1895, and the article 3 “Japan will concurin any proposal of the United States to the United Nations to place under itstrusteeship system, with the United States as the sole administering authority,Nansei Shoto south of 29deg. north latitude (including the Ryukyu Islands andthe Daito Islands)…” the US administered the Ryukyu Islands until June 11, 1971and returned it including the Senkaku islands to Japan under the “1971OkinawaReversion Agreement” which meant the Senkaku’s sovereignty owned by Japan all the time but not ROC.

 

Frankly, ROC does not even own anyterritorial sovereignty in the world today, not Taiwan not China. It is only anexiled government effective control of Taiwan and Pengfu under the umbrella ofUSMG holding the “Overall Effective Control” power how could ROC claim the sovereigntyof Senkaku Islands?

 

Yes, 2015 marks the 70th anniversary of the end of WWII both ROC and PRC rotated to demonstrate military exercises, military parade in Taiwan and China, bragging of their fights against Japan contributed to end the war without giving credit to the US forces. They also twisted the truth of WWII history that the military occupation on Taiwan has not been officially ended yet. Be honest to the WWII history.Yes, it is time to officially end the military occupation on Taiwan, it is time for ROC to return China now, hands off Taiwan and let Taiwanese be their own masters.

 

 JohnHsieh

Hayward, California

Advertisements 廣告