設為首頁  加入最愛網
會員中心 贊助提供 徵求志工 線上電台 優惠精品 合作夥伴 關於我們 連絡我們
 
         
  首頁 > 影音網>票投台灣價值 Vote for Taiwan Value
票投台灣價值 Vote for Taiwan Value

[原著]

[謝鎮寬]於2018-04-05 20:04:38上傳[]

 



票投台灣價值

 

台灣價值是台灣優先、而非中國第一,人民享有言論自由、社會民主、生存平等和政治公平正義,而不是無限任期的總統極權。那些支持、附和及背書一中原則者,都是違背台灣價值的叛徒。

 

台灣有句口語指人無能逞強,三口咬、未見餡是指一個人只虛有其表,其實啥都不會。如果那個人只是一個普通人,沒有人會在乎他是如何耍賴。但如果他是一位首長,那麼其轄區人民就會遭受災殃。

 

勞倫斯彼得曾說:工作都是由尚未致失能的員工所完成,但,無奈每一個職位都會被一個無能的員工給佔住。」公職人員必須適所適任。有時候一位好經理不見得會就是一個稱職的執行長,而一位好執行長不見得會質變成一個適任的董事長。彼得原理是拿來檢視公司或政府高層的好工具,看看他們是否稱職適才適用、有真本事。

 

一九四五年第二次世界大戰剛剛停火時,盟國試圖確定台灣人民,是否有獨立建國意志或只意圖成為中國公民。無奈當時台灣精英前輩,如林獻堂、蔡培火、蔣渭水,他們都誤以為中國政府將會幫助台灣實現未來自主,而選擇與中華民國政府密切合作,放棄行使如韓國人民強烈要求獨立的自決權力。落得最後由日本於舊金山和平條約第B款,宣佈放棄對台灣澎湖所有權利、名份和主張;而於第二條A款,卻正式宣佈承認韓國獨立,放棄對韓國包括濟州島、巨文島與鬱陵島之所有權利、名份與主張。


 

一失足成千古恨,當時那些台灣精英們的錯誤判斷,使台灣陷入了今天,我們所面臨的無窮困境。慶幸的是,杜勒斯先生早有先見之明,沒有指定中國,不論是中華民國、還是中華人民共和國,成為台灣主權指定受權人。相反,明文授權美國軍事政府為台灣的主要佔領權國。


 真是令人羞愧,自舊金山和平條約簽定至今,已歷經六十七年,而台灣仍然被虛幻的中華民國政府統治,尤其現任執政的進黨是由本土精英所組成。儘管美國國會於一九七九年制定了台灣關係法,明文告知台灣人民,美國政府不承認中華民國,只承認台灣治理當局,但台灣人民卻不斷地選舉中華民國總統,而不敢宣稱要選台灣總統。 

為了競選二0二0年的中華民國總統,民進黨竟然願意與背叛台灣價值的台北市長柯文哲妥協。柯一再提倡,兩岸一家親、生命共同體。他讓中華人民共和國五星旗在台北市到處飛揚但卻限制任何象徵台灣的旗幟,縱容統促黨員一再打人卻未受罰;強拆公投護台聯盟的攤位卻不敢碰觸八百壯士、那些支持統一者汗毛 

四年前柯標榜自己是白色力量是支持台灣的墨綠志士但現在他完全變了調隨時唱和中國所表達和堆動的對台政策。令人困惑不解的是民進黨高層決者,竟然因為害怕他們的候選人,可能會在台北市長選舉中排老三、最後一名而猶豫,不敢的偏執採取行動,也很天真地期盼他不會跳入二0二0年的中華民國總統大選。民進黨到底在告訴台灣人民什麼,一個沒有勇氣接受挑戰的政黨?如果所有這些假設都是真的,那是多麼可 

請不要忘記水能載舟亦能覆舟。請不要低估人們的意,以為他們會永遠無條件支持,本土政權所作的任何決定;如果他們真要水像柯P這樣的親中政,選民是會給予說不。智者戒慎知所不足,愚者狂妄稱無所不知。請切記,政治舞台變化如此之快,政治家的任何決定,最後都逃不過要被歷史檢驗。柯是一位稱職的市長嗎?他有能力擔任總統?請不要重蹈一九四五年台灣精英前輩們覆轍,給台灣帶來無窮禍患。 

一個政黨必須為他們的追隨者標示,一個明確的目標和政策,民進黨為何要禮讓親中政客,會是因為害怕在選舉中失利?那為什麼不乾脆在總統大選也禮讓柯,因為民進黨也有可能會選舉失利?請務必堅持捍衛台灣價值,而不是算計選票輸贏。一旦您奮力維護正義、捍衛人民、障自由和堅持民主人民必將與您並肩為伍票投台灣價值。 

謝鎮寬

加州、海沃

Vote for Taiwan Value

 

Taiwan value is Taiwan first not China, people enjoy freedom of speech, democracy, liberty and justice, not dictatorship with unlimited terms of presidency. Those who support, echo and endorse the one China principle are against Taiwan value.

 

There is a saying in Taiwan of incompetency “after three bites still not seeing the meat filling” means a people impressive only in appearance to appear better than he is. If that person is just a plain individual nothing wrong and none will get hurt. But if he is a governor of a state then all his people will be suffered.

 

Laurence Peter said, "Work is accomplished by those employees who have not yet reached their level of incompetence. But, in time, every post tends to be occupied by an employee who is incompetent to carry out." A governmental official must be a right person at the right position. Sometimes a good manager won’t be a successful CEO, and a good CEO won’t be a good chairman of a company. Peter’s principle is a good tool to examine the top level of Taiwan government to see how competent they are.

 

In 1945 while WWII just ceased fire, the alliestried to figure out what was the real intension of Taiwan people to form an independent country or recognized a citizen of China. At that time those Taiwanese elites such as Lin Xiantang (林獻堂), Tsai Peihuo (蔡培火), Chiang Wei-shui (蔣渭水) mistook Chinese government would help Taiwan for future self-governing, so they worked closely with ROC government and gave up to exercise the self-determination rights as Korean people strongly asked for independence. It ended up Japan only renounced all right, title and claim to Formosa and the Pescadores in the San Francisco Peace Treaty Article 2-b, and recognized the independence of Korea, renounces all right, title and claim to Korea, including the islands of Quelpart, Port Hamilton and Dagelet under Article 2-a.

                                                    

A single slip may cause everlasting sorrow, the misjudgment made by those Taiwanese elites at that time trapped Taiwan into endless troubles that we are even facing today. Fortunately, Mr. John Dulles had foreseen the potential problem of Taiwan’s identity, that China, neither ROC nor PRC named as the recipient of Taiwan’s sovereignty. Instead, the USMG was named as the principal occupying power of Taiwan.  

 

It is a shame that sixty-seven years gone by since the signature of SFPT, Taiwan is still ruled by the ROC government especially the incumbent ruling party DPP formed by native grassroots elites. Though the US Congress constituted the Taiwan Relation Act in 1979 clearly informed Taiwan people that the US government de-recognized ROC and only recognized the governing authorities on Taiwan, Taiwan people kept electing the president of ROC anddared not to claim it as Taiwan President.

 

In order to campaign for the 2020 presidential election of ROC, DPP willing to compromise with Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) for his betray of Taiwan value. Ko has repeated promoted one family hood for both sides of Taiwan strait and they are the same life community. He allowed PRC flag flying all over his city Taipei but restricted any symbol flag of Taiwan, connivedpro-unified party members punching people without penalty, tore down the booth of pro-independent and did not touch those booth of pro-unification.  

 

Four years ago, Ko identified him self as the white power, a dark green favors of Taiwan independence but now he is totally different echoing whatever the PRC voiced and promoted the united front. It is surprised that DPP decision makers hesitated to take action against him for his betrayal because of afraid that their candidate may score number three the last one in Taipei mayoral election also naively to expect that Ko will not jump into the 2020 presidential election of ROC. What message has DPP delivered to Taiwan people, a party has no guts to fight? If all these assumptions are true, how sadit is.

 

Please don’t forget the water that bears the boat is the same that swallows it. Please don’t underestimate people’s wills, mistook that they will always support whatever a native grassroots government’s decision. If they favor for apro-Chinese politician such as KoP, voters will reject him. The wise man knows he knows nothing, the fool thinks he knows all. Please bear in mind the political stage shifts so quickly that whatever a Politian decided will be soon examined in history. Is Ko a competent mayor? Will he be a competent president? Please don’t fall into the same mistakes that Taiwanese elites made in 1945 leaving endless troubles to their future generations.

 

A political party must hold a clear goal and policy for their followers. Why DPP will make way humble to a pro-China politician just because of they might losein the mayoral election? Why not also treat him courtesy for the presidential election because DPP might also lose in the game? Please insist to defend theTaiwan value not counting votes winning or losing. Once you fight for justice, fight for people to defend liberty and democracy then people will work closely with you to cast their votes for Taiwan value.

 

John Hsieh

Hayward, California

Advertisements