設為首頁  加入最愛網
會員中心 贊助提供 徵求志工 線上電台 優惠精品 合作夥伴 關於我們 連絡我們
 
         
  首頁 > 影音網>「軍事佔領」vs. ROC流亡政權所謂的<光復台灣>
「軍事佔領」vs. ROC流亡政權所謂的<光復台灣>

[原著]

[TAF ]於2019-01-11 20:01:01上傳[]

 

簡釋: 19451025日是「軍事佔領」開始日;非中華民國ROC流亡政權所稱的<<光復台灣>>

.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IUZpXcHs8akl3l1UnANu9o1L7E5PUhgX8hP35UCMTAU/edit

(詳參連結link)

 

The truth ofOct. 25, 1945 ( 19451025日這一天起的「台灣地位真相」)

http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2019/01/12/2003707766

(By: Tom Chang 2019-01-12英文台北時報 link)

.

https://www.twclarify.com/taiwan/pages/oct25/

(進階-詳參本網站)

.

我們必須了解到,"併吞" "軍事佔領" 是互相對立的兩個觀念。當今的年代,領土被征服之後,根據拿破崙戰爭的結束(大約1815年)以來 所建立的先例,且在海牙公約中編成法典,並沒有「準則或理由」 可以藉之以完成,可將 所征服的領土予以立即併呑

 

1) 國際法規定:「軍事佔領不移轉主權」。

 

2)台灣的軍事佔領」始於 19451025日,而舊金山和平條約則於19520428日生效。 在和平條約中,日本放棄了對台灣的主權,但是沒有指定一個「收受國」。

.

在和平條約中:
.......


第2條:日本放棄了對台灣的主權,但是沒有指定一個「收受國」;


第4條:美國軍事政府USMG」對臺灣有管轄權 (含分配權及處分權);


第23條:美國被指定為台灣的主要佔領(權)國。  
........

 

3)要特別注意的是,台灣是日本主權領土到19520428日止。

 

4)重點在於,任何被佔領領土的 "最終政治地位"只有兩個可能的結果。 第一種情況是該領土依自己的權利成為「一個主權獨立國家」,不然就是成為另一主權獨立國家的 “一部分”。

 

5)基此,所經常聽到台灣的法律地位是 "未解決""未定" 的說法,更進而證明台灣現在仍停留在「軍事佔領」的情況中。

 

6)此外,因承認台灣仍是在軍事佔領之狀態下,我們就有了更進一步的證明,台灣仍然在"合法佔領者" (即征服者)的管轄之下。參照美日太平洋戰爭期間對台灣之軍事攻擊的紀錄,「征服者」就是美國

 

7)如上文所述,「合法的」佔領者就是領土的「征服者」,它有權利和義務「執行」被佔領領土之管理

 

 

Tom Chang

參考資料: https://www.twclarify.com/taiwan99/index.html

 

……

 

The truth of Oct. 25, 1945 (Taipei Times 01-12-2019)

 

After the outbreak of the Korean War on June 25, 1950, then-US president Harry Truman declaredthat the “neutralization of the Straits of Formosa”was in the best interest of the US. He sent the US Navy’s Seventh Fleet intothe Taiwan Strait to prevent any conflict between theRepublic of China and Red China. PresidentTruman’s actions must be understood vis-a-vis Taiwan’s legal status in 1950. Putsimply, if Taiwan had already been recognized as Chinese national territory,the Taiwan Strait would constitute an “internal sea” of China. There would beno legal basis for the president to direct the Seventh Fleet into the Strait.

 

On Aug. 25, 1950, the US replied to the UN Security Council,saying: “The action of the United States was expressly stated to be withoutprejudice to the future political settlement of the status of the island... The Chinese Government was asked by the Allies to take thesurrender of the Japanese forces on the island. That is the reason the Chineseare there now.”

 

This historical excerpt is just one example that shows theAllies did not recognize any transfer of Taiwan’s territorial sovereignty toChina upon the Oct. 25, 1945, Japanese surrender ceremonies.

Nevertheless, the historical analysis in my Dec. 28 letter(Letters, page 8) did not please Wen Lam Chang of HongKong (Letters, Jan. 4, page 8). He argued that “1945 marks the date whenChina resumed sovereignty over Taiwan, not the beginning of military occupationas Mr Chang contends.”

 

In support of his “resumed sovereignty” contention, heasserts that Taiwan “was returned to China in 1945 in accordance withinternational law provided under the 1943 CairoDeclaration and the 1945 Potsdam Declaration,which forms Japan’s instrument of unconditional surrender.”

However, my associates and I have never been able to findsuch examples — which could serve as “precedent” — in the writings of lawscholars.

 

Might I challenge W.L. Chang toprovide us with two, three, or more examples in the post-Napoleonic period where the international communityhas recognized “surrender ceremonies” as resulting in an immediate transfer ofterritorial sovereignty?

 

There is simply no international precedent for saying thatan international declaration (or “press release”) can create any such legal power upon the date of surrender.The overwhelming international precedent is that atransfer of territorial sovereignty must be specified in a treaty.

I also want to stress that Taiwanese territory is not a“special case.” The correct guidelines for handling Taiwan’s territory caneasily be found by researching the disposition of conquered territory after theWar of 1812, the Mexican-American War and the Spanish-American War.

The Web site of www.twclarify.com/taiwan/ https://www.twclarify.com/taiwan99/index.html

provides abundant data on these topics, including the “Truth of Oct. 25, 1945” and an “Overview of the San Francisco Peace Treaty.” Links toYouTube videos are also given. This information may beof interest to Taipei Times readers.

 

Tom Chang 01-12-2019

Alhambra, Californi

.

Advertisements